🔗 Share this article Iran Says It Could Resume American Nuclear Negotiations if Approached with 'Dignity' and 'Honor' Iran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated. Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy was effective, and shared fresh requests had been made by mediators to resume talks with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns. Walking a Difficult Path Araghchi is walking a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June. He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the previous talks. Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Terminated The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect. Ideal Resolution Proposed Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes. It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US". Present Status Tehran representatives said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in some form if negotiations restart. The US president in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a show. Diplomatic Standpoint In his speech to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the strikes began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities. Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making confidence challenging to reestablish. Diplomacy Remains the Final Answer Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently tried to impose their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and stays the primary resolution to address disputes, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to." "Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent tone." Recovery and Rebuilding In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and recovery, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We learned numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent." He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this assault."